This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Schlemper RJ , Riddell PH , Kato Y , Borchard F , Cooper HS , Dawsey SM , Dixon MF , Fenoglio-Preiser CM , Flejou JF , Geboes K , Hattori T , Hirota T , Itabashi M , Iwafuchi M , Iwashita A , Kim YI , Kirchner T , Klimpfinger M , Koike M , Lauwers GY , Lewin KJ , Oberhuber G , Offner F , Price AB , Rubio CA , Shimizu M , Shimoda T , Sipponen P , Solcia E , Stolte M , Watanabe H , Yamabe H
The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia
Gut. 2000 Aug;47(2) :251-255
AbstractBackground-Use of the conventional Western and Japanese classification systems of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia results in large differences among pathologists in the diagnosis of oesophageal, gastric, and colorectal neoplastic lesions. Aim-To develop common worldwide terminology for gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Methods-Thirty one pathologists from 12 countries reviewed 35 gastric, 20 colorectal, and 21 oesophageal biopsy and resection specimens. The extent of diagnostic agreement between those with Western and Japanese viewpoints was assessed by kappa statistics. The pathologists met in Vienna to discuss the results and to develop a new consensus terminology. Results-The large differences between the conventional Western and Japanese diagnoses were confirmed (percentage of specimens for which there was agreement and kappa values: 37% and 0.16 for gastric; 45% and 0.27 for colorectal; and 14% and 0.01 for oesophageal lesions). There was much better agreement among pathologists (71% and 0.55 for gastric; 65% and 0.47 for colorectal; and 62% and 0.31 for oesophageal lesions) when the original assessments of the specimens were regrouped into the categories of the proposed Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: (1) negative for neoplasia/dysplasia, (2) indefinite for neoplasia/dysplasia, (3) non-invasive low grade neoplasia (low grade adenoma/dysplasia), (4) non-invasive high grade neoplasia (high grade adenoma/dysplasia, non-invasive carcinoma and suspicion of invasive carcinoma), and (5) invasive neoplasia (intramucosal carcinoma, submucosal carcinoma or beyond). Conclusion-The differences between Western and Japanese pathologists in the diagnostic classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplastic lesions can be resolved largely by adopting the proposed terminology, which is based on cytological and architectural severity and invasion status.
NotesTimes Cited: 46 English Article 337UU GUT