This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Kuzmich S , Vanderveer LA , Walsh ES , Lacreta FP , Tew KD
Increased Levels of Glutathione-S-Transferase Pi-Transcript as a Mechanism of Resistance to Ethacrynic-Acid
Biochemical Journal. 1992 Jan 1;281 :219-224
AbstractSubpopulations of HT 29 human colon carcinoma cells (HT/M and HT/S) were selected for resistance to the glutathione S- transferase (GST) inhibitor ethacrynic acid (EA). Both clones displayed a 2-fold resistance to the selection agent and required its constant presence for the maintenance of the resistant phenotype. Purification and characterization of GST isoforms showed similar profiles in the wild-type (WT) and EA- resistant clones, with microheterogeneous forms of the pi isoenzyme detected in each case. Metabolism of EA in vitro in the presence of GSH and the isolated GST from each cell line was characterized by a biphasic disappearance of the parent drug; the initial rate at which each of these enzymes metabolized EA was similar. These enzymes also displayed similar K(m) values for 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. However, the amount of GST isolated per total cellular protein was 3.0- fold in HT/M and 1.6-fold in HT/S relative to WT in the continuous presence of EA. Under these conditions GST activity was increased by 2.3-fold in HT/M and 3.2-fold in HT/S as were GSH levels (2.7- and 4.1-fold for HT/M and HT/S respectively). When EA was removed, enzyme activity and GSH concentrations decreased to values similar to those of the WT. Slot-blot and Southern analyses of the DNA gave no evidence of GST-pi-gene amplification or rearrangement. However, RNA analyses by both slot-blot and Northern studies indicate a 2.5-3.5-fold elevation in the GST pi transcript in the EA-resistant population. Results from these studies indicate that: (1) maintenance of the EA-resistant phenotype requires constant presence of the agent; (2) the 2-fold resistance to EA can be quantitatively related to a 2-3-fold increase in GST activity and amount which appears to be the result of a 2.5-3.5-fold elevation in GST transcript; (3) EA, a Michael-reaction acceptor, can induce GST at the transcriptional level.
NotesEnglish Article 1 HA626 BIOCHEM J