This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Lerman C , Daly M , Sands C , Balshem A , Lustbader E , Heggan T , Goldstein L , James J , Engstrom P
Mammography Adherence and Psychological Distress among Women at Risk for Breast-Cancer
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993 Jul 7;85(13) :1074-1080
AbstractBackground: Previous studies estimate that first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer have a twofold to 10-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Recently, attention has focused on the mammography screening practices of women who are at high risk for breast cancer. Purpose: Our purpose was to characterize mammography screening practices in a sample of first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients and to identify variables that may serve as barriers to or facilitators of adherence to mammography. Methods: Cross- sectional (rather than prospective) data were collected by telephone interviews with 140 women aged 35-79 years who had a family history of breast cancer in at least one first-degree relative (mother, sister, or daughter). Data were recorded on mammography screening patterns, depression, stress impact, and breast cancer worries. Results: Women whose mammography history adhered to age-specific recommendations varied by age: 76% of first-degree relatives aged 35-39 years, 86% aged 40-49 years, and 63% aged 50 years or more. In bivariate analyses, level of education (P = .001), employment (P = .046), and time since diagnosis of the index patient (P = .044) were significantly and positively associated with mammography adherence. Variables associated negatively with adherence included age (P = .019), intrusive thoughts about breast cancer (P = .042), and breast cancer worries that interfered with daily functioning (P = 004). MultivariAte analysis by logistic regression indicated that only breast cancer worries (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-5.9) and education (OR = 4.8; CI = 1.6-14.3) were significant independent predictors of mammogaphy adherence. Conclusions: This study suggests that most women at high risk for breast cancer adhere to the recommended mammography screening guidelines of the National Cancer Institute. However, rates of adherence among high-risk women aged 50 years and older are suboptimal; only 63% of these women received annual screening mammograms, and 13% had never been screened. Breast cancer worries may pose a barrier to mammography adherence among high-risk women, particularly those with less formal education. Implications: Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to validate the present findings and to evaluate the impact of psychoeducational interventions for women with affected first-degree relatives.
NotesTimes Cited: 169 English Article LK823 J NAT CANCER INST