FCCC LOGO Faculty Publications
Speicher LA , Barone LR , Chapman AE , Hudes GR , Laing N , Smith CD , Tew KD
P-Glycoprotein Binding and Modulation of the Multidrug- Resistant Phenotype by Estramustine
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994 May 4;86(9) :688-694
PMID: ISI:A1994NH71400013   
Back to previous list
Abstract
Background: Previous preclinical studies of combinations of estramustine and vinblastine or paclitaxel (Taxol) have shown that it is possible to achieve a greater than additive cytotoxicity with these antimicrotubule drug combinations. Phase II studies in hormone-refractory prostate cancer have demonstrated clinical antitumor activity of sufficient magnitude to stimulate further laboratory and clinical studies of these drug combinations. Purpose: Our purpose was to characterize the interactions of estramustine with P- glycoprotein and to determine its effects. Methods: Standard laboratory techniques were used to study the effects of estramustine on intracellular drug concentrations, cytotoxicity, and induction of messenger RNA (mRNA) for the MDR1 (also known as PGY1) gene. Using a photoaffinity analogue of estramustine 17-0-[[2-[3-(4-azido-3- [I-125]- iodophenyl)propionamido]ethyl]- carbamyl]estradiol-3-N-bis(2- chloro-ethyl)carbamate ([I-125]AIPP-estramustine), binding to the membrane proteins of human ovarian (SKOV3) and their multidrug-resistant counterpart SKVLB1 cells was studied. Southern-blot analysis was performed on DNA extracted from human prostate carcinoma wild-type DU145, estramustine- resistant cell line (E4), and SKVLB1 cells. Results: Membrane fractions from SKOV3 and SKVLB1 cells were analyzed for proteins that could be photoaffinity labeled with [I-125]AIPP- estramustine. Competitive inhibition of this binding was achieved with excess concentrations of (in order of efficacy) estramustine, vinblastine, verapamil, progesterone, and, to a lesser degree, by paclitaxel but not with estramustine phosphate, estradiol, and estriol. SKVLB1 cells accumulated much less [H-3]vinblastine and [H-3]paclitaxel than did SKOV3 cells. Estramustine caused a concentration-dependent enhancement of drug accumulation in the SKVLB1 cells to a maximum of approximately 12-fold. No effect of estramustine was apparent for the wild-type SKOV3 cells. In comparison with verapamil, estramustine was less effective as a modulator; however, estramustine demonstrated good chemosensitizing activity in combination with actinomycin D and vinblastine. Neither short-term, low-dose nor longer-term, higher concentrations were found to produce measurable transcript (mRNA for the MDR1 gene) levels. Such data suggest that, at least for two distinct human cell lines (SKOV3 and DU145), estramustine does not induce the overexpression of the MDR1 gene. Conclusion: It is apparent from the P-glycoprotein data that estramustine interacts with this efflux pump, altering intracellular drug accumulation. Overall, the nonempiric basis for including estramustine in clinical protocols that contain other multidrug-resistant drugs is strengthened by the present data.
Notes
English Article NH714 J NAT CANCER INST