This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Carreau NA , Pail O , Armand P , Merryman R , Advani RH , Spinner , Herrera A , Chen R , Tomassetti S , Ramchandren R , Hamid MS , Assouline S , Santiago R , Wagner-Johnston N , Paul S , Svoboda J , Bair SM , Barta SK , Liu Y , Nathan S , Karmali R , Burkart M , Torka P , David K , Wei C , Lansigan F , Emery L , Persky D , Smith S , Godfrey J , Chavez J , Xia Y , Troxel , Diefenbach C
Checkpoint Blockade Treatment May Sensitize Hodgkin Lymphoma to Subsequent Therapy
Oncologist. 2020 Oct;25(10) :878-885
PMID: 32720734 PMCID: PMC7543382 URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720734
AbstractBACKGROUND: Targeted therapies and checkpoint blockade therapy (CBT) have shown efficacy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting, but once discontinued due to progression or side effects, it is unclear how successful further therapies will be. Moreover, there is no data on optimal sequencing of these treatments with standard therapies and other novel agents. In a multicenter, retrospective analysis we investigated whether exposure to CBT could sensitize HL to subsequent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen centers across the US and Canada retrospectively queried medical records for eligible patients. The primary aim was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) to post-CBT treatment using the Lugano criteria. Secondary aims included progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included. Seventy-two percent had stage 3-4 disease, and the population was heavily pretreated with a median of 4 therapies before CBT. Most patients (65%) discontinued CBT due to progression. The ORR to post-CBT therapy was 62%, with a median PFS of 6.3 months and median OS of 21 months. Post-CBT treatment regimens consisted of chemotherapy (44%), targeted agents (19%), immunotherapy (15%), transplant conditioning (14%), chemotherapy/targeted combination (7%), and clinical trials (1%). No significant difference in OS was found when stratified by post-CBT regimen. CONCLUSION: In a heavily pretreated R/R HL population, CBT may sensitize patients to subsequent treatment, even after progression on CBT. Post-CBT regimen category did not impact OS. This may be a novel treatment strategy, which warrants further investigation in prospective clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Relapsed and refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) presents a clinical challenge, and better treatment strategies are greatly desired to prevent these patients from ultimately succumbing to their disease. The results of this multicenter analysis concur with a smaller, earlier report that checkpoint blockade therapy usage in R/R HL may sensitize patients their subsequent treatment. This approach may potentially be used to extend the number of options patients have or to bridge them to transplant. Prospective data is warranted prior to practice implementation. As more work is done in this area, we may also be able to optimize sequencing of CBT and novel agents in the treatment paradigm to minimize treatment-related toxicity and thus improve patient quality of life.
Notes1549-490x Carreau, N A Pail, O Armand, P Merryman, R Advani, R H Spinner Herrera, A F Chen, R Tomassetti, S Ramchandren, R Hamid Assouline, S Santiago, R Wagner-Johnston, N Paul, S Svoboda, J Bair, S M Barta, S K Liu, Y Nathan, S Karmali, R Burkart, M Torka, P David, K Wei, C Lansigan, F Emery, L Persky, D Smith, S Godfrey, J Chavez, J Xia, Y Troxel Diefenbach, C Orcid: 0000-0003-1116-3246 Journal Article United States Oncologist. 2020 Jul 28. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0167.