This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Gershman B , Maroni P , Tilburt JC , Volk RJ , Konety B , Bennett CL , Kutikov A , Smaldone MC , Chen V , Kim SP
A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on prediction tools and nomograms for localized prostate cancer
World J Urol. 2019 Oct;37(10) :2099-2108
PMID: 30671637 URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671637
AbstractPURPOSE: Although prediction tools for prostate cancer (PCa) are essential for high-quality treatment decision-making, little is known about the degree of confidence in existing tools and whether they are used in clinical practice from radiation oncologists (RO) and urologists (URO). Herein, we performed a national survey of specialists about perceived attitudes and use of prediction tools. METHODS: In 2017, we invited 940 URO and 911 RO in a national survey to query their confidence in and use of the D'Amico criteria, Kattan Nomogram, and CAPRA score. The statistical analysis involved bivariate association and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify physician characteristics (age, gender, race, practice affiliation, specialty, access to robotic surgery, ownership of linear accelerator and number of prostate cancer per week) associated with survey responses and use of active surveillance (AS) for low-risk PCa. RESULTS: Overall, 691 (37.3%) specialists completed the surveys. Two-thirds (range 65.6-68.4%) of respondents reported being "somewhat confident", but only a fifth selected "very confident" for each prediction tool (18.0-20.1%). 19.1% of specialists in the survey reported not using any prediction tools in clinical practice, which was higher amongst URO than RO (23.9 vs. 13.4%; p < 0.001). Respondents who reported not using prediction tools were also associated with low utilization of AS in their low-risk PCa patients (adjusted OR 2.47; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While a majority of RO and URO view existing prediction tools for localized PCa with some degree of confidence, a fifth of specialists reported not using any such tools in clinical practice. Lack of using such tools was associated with low utilization of AS for low-risk PCa.
Notes1433-8726 Gershman, Boris Maroni, Paul Tilburt, Jon C Volk, Robert J Konety, Badrinath Bennett, Charles L Kutikov, Alexander Smaldone, Marc C Chen, Victor Kim, Simon P ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7117-1443 Journal Article Germany World J Urol. 2019 Oct;37(10):2099-2108. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02637-6. Epub 2019 Jan 22.