This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Deng N , Flynn WF , Xia J , Vijayan RS , Zhang B , He P , Mentes A , Gallicchio E , Levy RM
Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9) :743-751
PMID: 27562018 PMCID: PMC5869689 URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27562018
AbstractWe describe binding free energy calculations in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 for blind prediction of the binding affinities of 180 ligands to Hsp90. The present D3R challenge was built around experimental datasets involving Heat shock protein (Hsp) 90, an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone which is an important anticancer drug target. The Hsp90 ATP binding site is known to be a challenging target for accurate calculations of ligand binding affinities because of the ligand-dependent conformational changes in the binding site, the presence of ordered waters and the broad chemical diversity of ligands that can bind at this site. Our primary focus here is to distinguish binders from nonbinders. Large scale absolute binding free energy calculations that cover over 3000 protein-ligand complexes were performed using the BEDAM method starting from docked structures generated by Glide docking. Although the ligand dataset in this study resembles an intermediate to late stage lead optimization project while the BEDAM method is mainly developed for early stage virtual screening of hit molecules, the BEDAM binding free energy scoring has resulted in a moderate enrichment of ligand screening against this challenging drug target. Results show that, using a statistical mechanics based free energy method like BEDAM starting from docked poses offers better enrichment than classical docking scoring functions and rescoring methods like Prime MM-GBSA for the Hsp90 data set in this blind challenge. Importantly, among the three methods tested here, only the mean value of the BEDAM binding free energy scores is able to separate the large group of binders from the small group of nonbinders with a gap of 2.4 kcal/mol. None of the three methods that we have tested provided accurate ranking of the affinities of the 147 active compounds. We discuss the possible sources of errors in the binding free energy calculations. The study suggests that BEDAM can be used strategically to discriminate binders from nonbinders in virtual screening and to more accurately predict the ligand binding modes prior to the more computationally expensive FEP calculations of binding affinity.
Notes1573-4951 Deng, Nanjie ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-3526 Flynn, William F Xia, Junchao Vijayan, R S K Zhang, Baofeng He, Peng Mentes, Ahmet Gallicchio, Emilio Levy, Ronald M R01 GM030580/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States S10 RR027444/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States Journal Article Netherlands J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):743-751. Epub 2016 Aug 25.