This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Curcillo PG , Wu AS , Podolsky ER , Graybeal C , Katkhouda N , Saenz A , Dunham R , Fendley S , Neff M , Copper C , Bessler M , Gumbs AA , Norton M , Iannelli A , Mason R , Moazzez A , Cohen L , Mouhlas A , Poor A
Single-port-access (SPA(TM)) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2010 Aug;24(8) :1854-1860
AbstractAn important aspect of a new surgical technique is whether it can be performed by other surgeons in other institutions. The authors report the first 297 cases in a multi-institutional and multinational review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed via a single portal of entry. Data were collected retrospectively for the initial patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy by 13 surgeons who performed these procedures in their institutions after training by the authors. The review included operative time, blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay (LOS), necessary additional trocars, and other parameters important to cholecystectomy. A database of all the single-port-access (SPA) surgeries performed by the surgeons included demographic and procedural details, LOS, complications, and initial follow-up data. To date, 297 single-port cholecystectomies have been performed for a variety of diagnoses, primarily cholelithiasis. The average operative time was 71 min, and the average LOS was 1-2 days. The average blood loss was minimal. The use of additional port sites outside the umbilicus occurred in 34 of the cases. Of the 35 intraoperative cholangiograms performed, 34 were successful. No significant complications occurred except for seromas and minor postoperative wound infections. These results are comparable with those for standard multiport cholecystectomy. In addition, no access site hernias (ASH) occurred. The findings demonstrate that SPA surgery is an alternative to multiport laparoscopy with fewer scars and better cosmesis. One factor affecting the rate for adoption of SPA surgery among other surgeons is the reproducibility of this new procedure. Although this study had insufficient data to determine fully the benefits of SPA surgery, the feasibility of this procedure with safe, acceptable results was demonstrated in this initial large series across multinational institutions.
NotesCurcillo, Paul G., II Wu, Andrew S. Podolsky, Erica R. Graybeal, Casey Katkhouda, Namir Saenz, Alex Dunham, Robert Fendley, Steven Neff, Marc Copper, Chad Bessler, Marc Gumbs, Andrew A. Norton, Michael Iannelli, Antonio Mason, Rodney Moazzez, Ashkan Cohen, Larry Mouhlas, Angela Poor, Alex 21 Springer; 233 spring st, new york, ny 10013 usa 620gz