This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Ringer DP , Norton TR , Self RR
Reaction product inactivation of aryl sulfotransferase IV following electrophilic substitution by the sulfuric acid ester of N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene
Carcinogenesis. 1992 Jan;13(1) :107-12
PMID: 1733562 URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=1733562
AbstractRat liver N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-OH-2AAF) sulfotransferase activity is mediated by aryl sulfotransferase IV (AST IV) and causes the bioactivation of N-OH-2AAF to a highly reactive sulfuric acid ester form putatively capable of inducing liver cancer. Dietary administration of 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF) to induce hepatocarcinogenesis in rats has been shown to cause a rapid loss in N-OH-2AAF sulfotransferase activity. A possible mechanism for the in vivo loss in sulfotransferase activity may be the PAPS-dependent, sulfotransferase-catalyzed, reaction product inactivation of the enzyme by covalent reaction with the N-OH-2AAF sulfuric acid ester. In vitro studies to evaluate this possibility utilized a highly purified form of AST IV and measured the extent of PAPS-dependent interaction between the enzyme and N-OH-2[9-14C]AAF. The results showed the presence of a adenosine-3'-phospho-5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS)-dependent 14C-labeling of AST IV. The labeling could be blocked if the sulfotransferase inhibitor pentachlorophenol was present. Analysis of 14C-labeled AST IV following alkaline digestion and chromatography of digestion products indicated that AST IV cysteine and methionine residues were primary sites of 2[9-14C]AAF adduction. Studies involving the pretreatment of AST IV with PAPS and N-OH-2AAF prior to the measurement of N-OH-2AAF sulfotransferase activity showed a close parallel between formation of the AST IV cysteine-2AAF adduct and loss of activity. Similar studies showed that enzyme inactivation and cysteine-2AAF adduct formation could be blocked when excessive amounts of a competing nucleophile, methionine, were present during the pretreatment step, suggesting that inactivation does not proceed by a mechanism-based process. Finally, experiments involving prior reaction of AST IV with the thiol-blocking agent, N-ethylmaleimide, before measurement of enzyme activity showed essentially full loss of sulfotransferase activity and suggested that formation of AST IV cysteine-2AAF adducts could be a mechanism for enzyme inactivation. These results indicate that the in vitro inactivation of AST IV by the reactive N-OH-2AAF sulfuric acid ester is accompanied by covalent binding to AST IV, possibly through the formation of cysteine-2AAF adducts, and suggests that this mechanism merits further consideration as a basis for the loss of N-OH-2AAF sulfotransferase activity in vivo.
NotesRinger, D P Norton, T R Self, R R United states Carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis. 1992 Jan;13(1):107-12.