This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
Li CY , Li JL , Cheng JP , Wu Z , Pei LC , Fan JJ
Research of point flux estimation method
Nuclear Science and Engineering. 2008 Jul;159(3) :284-295
AbstractIn the calculation of pointflux by Monte Carlo simulation, there is a special disadvantage in the mostly used method of next event estimation (NEE) for which theoretical variance is infinite. And, this problem has not yet been solved satisfactorily. The purpose of this paper is to provide some new ideas to solve the problem of infinite variance without introducing any bias for the mean. To eliminate the unbounded factors, the relations among the different state variables for two neighboring collisions are analyzed; then, on the basis of the integral expression of the once-more scattered flux contribution to the point detector, by changing the state variables to be sampled, six basic methods are derived-two of them are NEE and collision probability estimation, and four are new methods. Furthermore, based on one of the new methods, by variable substitution, a new method called exponent biased sample estimation (EBS) is obtained that can eliminate the vertical bar(r) over right arrow (d) - (r) over right arrow (m)vertical bar(-2) singularity factor and has no exponent factor, which exists in other methods. The benchmark results show that EBS is much better than NEE with the variance of one order of magnitude smaller and a figure-of-merit factor of several hundreds higher sometimes, and its calculation efficiency is higher than that of the once more collision flux estimation method Compared with the direction biased sample estimation method, EBS has no advantage in variance, but the sample procedures are much simpler and use less CPU time.
NotesISI Document Delivery No.: 317EW Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 13 Cited References: *X5 M CARL TEAM, 2003, LAUR031987 LOS AL NA, P2 AUTHIER N, 2001, NUCL SCI ENG, V137, P146 FAN J, 2004, THESIS TSINGHUA U, P60 KALLI HJ, 1977, LA6865MS LOS AL NAT KALOS MH, 1963, NUCL SCI ENG, V16, P111 LUX I, 1991, M CARLO PARTICLE TRA, P378 PEI L, 1980, M CARLO METHOD APPL, P353 RAAB A, 1999, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V123, P27 STEINBERG HA, 1971, NUCL SCI ENG, V44, P406 STEINBERG HA, 1973, T AM NUCL SOC, V17, P259 STEINBERG HA, 1974, T AM NUCL SOC, V19, P442 STEINBERG HA, 1976, T AM NUCL SOC, V23, P607 XIE Z, 1985, ANAL NUCL REACTOR PH, P64 Li, Chunyan Li, Junli Cheng, Jianping Wu, Zhen Pei, Lucheng Fan, Jiajin AMER NUCLEAR SOC; 555 N KENSINGTON AVE, LA GRANGE PK, IL 60526 USA