This is an archive of papers published by the staff and faculty of Fox Chase Cancer Center. For questions about content, please contact Talbot Research Library
Last updated on
The future of "Retro" robotic partial nephrectomy
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5) :2199-2208
PMID: 34159103 PMCID: PMC8185662 URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159103
AbstractPartial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard treatment for appropriately selected renal masses. Recent surgical advancements and adoption of the robotic technique has led to greater adoption of nephron-sparing surgery. Robotic PN was initially described via the transperitoneal (TP) approach, however, retroperitoneal (RP) access is possible and in some cases more desirable. In the RP approach, the kidney is accessed from its posterior surface and the intraperitoneal space is avoided. The RP approach to PN has the benefit of avoiding intraperitoneal viscera and colonic mobilization in patients with extensive prior abdominal surgery. The technique also eliminates the need for renal unit rotation in patients with posterior tumors and affords access to masses directly posterior to the renal hilum. The RP and TP approach to PN have shown similar oncologic and perioperative outcomes. Several recent studies have reported shorter operative times and lengths of stay (LOS) with comparable warm ischemia times for the RP approach when compared to transperitoneal PN (tPN). Given the indispensable deliverables of this approach in select patients, robotic retroperitoneal PN (rPN) should be in the armamentarium of a versatile urologic kidney surgeon. This review describes the current state of rPN and compares the indications and outcomes of the TP and RP approaches.
Notes2223-4691 Strauss, David M Lee, Randall Maffucci, Fenizia Abbott, Daniel Masic, Selma Kutikov, Alexander Journal Article Review Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2199-2208. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.09.