| Publication |
Investigator(s) |
Weinberg DS, Miller S, Rodoletz M, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Buzaglo J, Keenan E, Marks J, Bieber E. Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention. J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(3):225-32.
BACKGROUND: Increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a public health goal. We hypothesized that non-compliant, average risk women would demonstrate low levels of CRC knowledge and underestimate their CRC risk. METHODS: Participants identified prior to routine gynecological visits completed a survey assessing demographics, CRC knowledge, risk perception, and screening intention. RESULTS: The 318 participants demonstrated high levels of CRC knowledge. The majority estimated their risk incorrectly and had no intention of screening participation in the future. There were no consistent relationships between knowledge, risk perception, and screening intent. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge alone is an inadequate stimulus of screening adherence.
|
Weinberg
Miller
Fleisher
|
Waldman SA, Hyslop T, Schulz S, Barkun A, Nielsen K, Haaf J, Bonaccorso C, Li YY, Weinberg DS. Association of GUCY2C Expression in Lymph Nodes With Time to Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival in pN0 Colorectal Cancer. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009 Feb;301(7):745-52.
Context The established relationship between lymph node metastasis and prognosis in colorectal cancer suggests that recurrence in 25% of patients with lymph nodes free of tumor cells by histopathology ( pN0) reflects the presence of occult metastases. Guanylyl cyclase 2C ( GUCY2C) is a marker expressed by colorectal tumors that could reveal occult metastases in lymph nodes and better estimate recurrence risk. Objective To examine the association of occult lymph node metastases detected by quantifying GUCY2C messenger RNA, using the reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction, with recurrence and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective study of 257 patients with pN0 colorectal cancer enrolled between March 2002 and June 2007 at 9 US and Canadian centers ( 7 academic medical centers and 2 community hospitals) provided 2570 fresh lymph nodes measuring 5 mm or larger for histopathology and GUCY2C messenger RNA analysis. Patients were followed up for a median of 24 months ( range, 2- 63 months) for disease recurrence or death. Main Outcome Measures Time to recurrence ( primary outcome) and diseasefree survival ( secondary outcome) relative to expression of GUCY2C in lymph nodes. Results Thirty- two patients ( 12.5%) had lymph nodes negative for GUCY2C ( pN0 [ mol-]), and all but 2 remained free of disease during follow- up ( recurrence rate, 6.3%; 95% confidence interval [ CI], 0.8%- 20.8%). Conversely, 225 patients ( 87.5%) had lymph nodes positive for GUCY2C ( pN0 [ mol +]), and 47 developed recurrent disease ( 20.9%; 95% CI, 15.8%- 26.8%) ( P=. 006). Multivariate analyses revealed that GUCY2C in lymph nodes was an independent marker of prognosis. Patients who were pN0 ( mol +) exhibited earlier time to recurrence ( adjusted hazard ratio, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.11- 19.57; P=. 04) and reduced disease- free survival ( adjusted hazard ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.15-9.29; P=. 03). Conclusion Expression of GUCY2C in histologically negative lymph nodes appears to be independently associated with time to recurrence and disease- free survival in patients with pN0 colorectal cancer.
|
Weinberg
|
Ke E, Patel BB, Liu T, Li XM, Haluszka O, Hoffman JP, Ehya H, Young NA, Watson JC, Weinberg DS, Nguyen MT, Cohen SJ, Meropol NJ, Litwin S, Tokar JL, Yeung AT. Proteomic analyses of pancreatic cyst fluids. Pancreas. 2009 Mar;38(2):e33-42.
OBJECTIVES: There are currently no diagnostic indicators that are consistently reliable, obtainable, and conclusive for diagnosing and risk-stratifying pancreatic cysts. Proteomic analyses were performed to explore pancreatic cyst fluids to yield effective diagnostic biomarkers. METHODS: We have prospectively recruited 20 research participants and prepared their pancreatic cyst fluids specifically for proteomic analyses. Proteomic approaches applied were as follows: (1) matrix-assisted laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry peptidomics with LC/MS/MS (HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry) protein identification; (2) 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis; (3) GeLC/MS/MS (tryptic digestion of proteins fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and identified by LC/MS/MS). RESULTS: Sequencing of more than 350 free peptides showed that exopeptidase activities rendered peptidomics of cyst fluids unreliable; protein nicking by proteases in the cyst fluids produced hundreds of protein spots from the major proteins, making 2-dimensional gel proteomics unmanageable; GeLC/MS/MS revealed a panel of potential biomarker proteins that correlated with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CONCLUSIONS: Two homologs of amylase, solubilized molecules of 4 mucins, 4 solubilized CEA-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs), and 4 S100 homologs may be candidate biomarkers to facilitate future pancreatic cyst diagnosis and risk-stratification. This approach required less than 40 microL of cyst fluid per sample, offering the possibility to analyze cysts smaller than 1 cm in diameter.
|
Yeung
Meropol
Weinberg
Litwin
Cohen
|
|
|
Weinberg
|
Weinberg DS, Miller S, Rodoletz M, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Buzaglo J, Keenan E, Marks J, Bieber E. Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention. J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(3):225-32.
BACKGROUND: Increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a public health goal. We hypothesized that non-compliant, average risk women would demonstrate low levels of CRC knowledge and underestimate their CRC risk. METHODS: Participants identified prior to routine gynecological visits completed a survey assessing demographics, CRC knowledge, risk perception, and screening intention. RESULTS: The 318 participants demonstrated high levels of CRC knowledge. The majority estimated their risk incorrectly and had no intention of screening participation in the future. There were no consistent relationships between knowledge, risk perception, and screening intent. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge alone is an inadequate stimulus of screening adherence.
|
Weinberg
Miller
Fleisher
|
|
|
Weinberg
Al-Saleem
|
Tokar JL, Haluszka O, Weinberg DS. Endoscopic therapy of dysplasia and early-stage cancers of the esophagus. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007 Jan;17(1):10-21.
Endoscopic treatments have become a viable alternative for some patients with early-stage esophageal neoplasia. Although esophagectomy remains the standard of care for high-grade dysplasia and superficial cancers, surgical morbidity and mortality may deter patients who are medically unfit or reluctant to undergo surgery. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the best-studied nonsurgical approaches at present. PDT has been reported to eradicate high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early Barrett's cancers at rates ranging from 75% to 100% and 17% to 100%, respectively, and a recent randomized controlled trial confirmed that PDT may prevent progression of HGD to cancer. Complete remission rates greater than 90% have also been reported with EMR and other mucosa-ablating interventions, although recurrence rates necessitate close endoscopic surveillance and retreatment in some patients. In addition to PDT and EMR, several emerging endoscopic treatment options for superficial esophageal neoplasia may provide attractive alternatives to surgery.
|
Weinberg
|
Manne SL, Chung DC, Weinberg DS, Vig HS, Catts Z, Cabral MK, Shannon K, Meropol NJ. Knowledge and attitudes about Microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2007 Oct;16(10):2110-7.
For individuals meeting Bethesda criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, the microsatellite instability (MSI) test is recommended as a screening evaluation before proceeding to genetic testing. The MSI test is new to the medical setting, but will be increasingly used to screen patients at high risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The main goals of this study were to examine knowledge about and exposure to the MSI test among individuals considering the test, to evaluate perceived benefits and barriers to undergoing the MSI test, and to identify the demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of the perceived benefits and barriers to undergoing the test. One hundred and twenty-five patients completed a survey after being offered the test, but prior to making the decision whether to pursue MSI testing. Results indicated low levels of knowledge about and previous exposure to the MSI test. Participants held positive attitudes about!
|
Meropol
Weinberg
Manne
|
Myers RE, Weinberg DS, Manne SL, Sifri R, Cocroft J, Kash K, Wilfond B. Genetic and environmental risk assessment for colorectal cancer risk in primary care practice settings: a pilot study. Genet Med. 2007 Jun;9(6):378-84.
PURPOSE:: The assessment of genetic variants and environmental exposures (i.e., genetic and environmental risk assessment) may permit individualized risk stratification for common diseases as part of routine care. A pilot study was conducted to assess the uptake of, and response to, testing for colorectal cancer risk among average risk patients in primary care practice settings. METHODS:: Physicians in primary care practices identified patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening and referred them to the study. Research staff administered a baseline survey to consenting patients. At a scheduled office visit, participants underwent decision counseling with a trained nurse educator to facilitate informed decision making about being tested for methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase status and red blood cell folate level. Combined assessment can stratify colorectal cancer risk. Test results were disclosed within 2 weeks after the visit. Postvisit and 1-month endpoint surveys were administered. Univariable analyses of survey data were performed to assess changes from baseline in genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening-related knowledge and perceptions. RESULTS:: Of the 57 patients who were referred to the study, 25 (44%) consented to participate, and all but one were tested. Participant knowledge about genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening, perceived colorectal cancer screening response efficacy, and perceived social support for colorectal cancer screening increased significantly from baseline. Participants reported low levels of intrusive thoughts about CRC. CONCLUSION:: Knowledge and favorable perceptions of colorectal cancer screening increased, as did knowledge about genetic and environmental risk assessment, after exposure to the study intervention. Further research is needed to assess genetic and environmental risk assessment uptake and impact at the population level.
|
Weinberg
Manne
|
Weinberg DS, Lewis N, Meyers M, Sigurdson E. Colorectal neoplasia. Wexner SD, Stollman N, editors. New York: Taylor Francis; 2007.
|
Weinberg
Sigurdson
|
|
|
Weinberg
Sigurdson
|
Deshpande N, Weinberg DS. The evolving role of CT colonography. Cancer Invest. 2007;25(2):127-33.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended as part of standard preventive care. All average risk persons over the age of 50 y are eligible. Various authorities have advocated fecal occult blood teesting, flexible sigmoidoscopy, barium enema and colonoscopy at varying intervals as acceptable screening options. Despite the array of choices, CRC screening lags in frequency behind other cancer screening maneuvers like mammography or Pap smear. Of late, there is growing interest in CT colonography (CTC) as another screening option. CTC, or virtual colonoscopy, may represent an attractive, non-invasive method of CRC screening that provides images akin to traditional colonoscopy. Improvements in CTC performance, especially when coupled with declining costs, suggest that CTC's role in average risk screening will increase in the future. This review summarizes available data about the efficacy of CTC in average and high risk screening populations. Current indications as well as limitations to this technology are discussed, as are practical issues like the cost-effectiveness of CTC for widespread use.
|
Weinberg
|
Coups EJ, Manne SL, Meropol NJ, Weinberg DS. Multiple behavioral risk factors for colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer screening status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Mar;16(3):510-6.
BACKGROUND: Individuals who are not adherent to colorectal cancer screening have a greater prevalence of several other behavioral risk factors for colorectal cancer than adherent individuals. However, previous relevant studies have typically not considered the co-occurrence of such behavioral risk factors at the individual level. In the current study, we examined the prevalence, patterns, and predictors of multiple behavioral risk factors for colorectal cancer according to colorectal cancer screening status (adherent versus not adherent). METHODS: The study sample consisted of 11,090 individuals ages 50 years and older who participated in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Based on responses to survey questions, individuals were categorized as being adherent or not adherent to colorectal cancer screening guidelines and were also denoted as having or not having each of seven behavioral risk factors for colorectal cancer (smoking, low physical activity, low fruit and vegetable intake, high caloric intake from fat, obesity, high alcohol intake, and low intake of multivitamins). RESULTS: Individuals who were not adherent to screening reported having a greater number of risk factors than adherent individuals. For each screening group, there was a high prevalence of having low physical activity, low fruit and vegetable intake, and low intake of multivitamins. Demographic and health-related correlates of behavioral risk factor prevalence were identified in both screening groups. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with efforts to promote colorectal cancer screening uptake and adherence, there is a need to develop interventions to modify the colorectal cancer behavioral risk factors that are common among screening-adherent and nonadherent individuals. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(3):510-6).
|
Meropol
Weinberg
Manne
Coups
|
Hurley K, Miller SM, Rubin L, Weinberg DS. The individual facing genetic issues: Information processing, decision making, perception, and health-protective behaviors. Miller SM, McDaniel SH, Rolland JS, Feetham SL, editors. New York: W.W. Norton; 2006.
|
Weinberg
Miller
|
Schulz S, Hyslop T, Haaf J, Bonaccorso C, Nielsen K, Witek ME, Birbe R, Palazzo J, Weinberg D, Waldman SA. A Validated Quantitative Assay to Detect Occult Micrometastases by Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction of Guanylyl Cyclase C in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 1;12(15):4545-52.
PURPOSE: Guanylyl cyclase C (GCC), a receptor for bacterial diarrheagenic enterotoxins, may be a prognostic and predictive marker to detect occult micrometastases in patients undergoing staging for colorectal cancer. However, quantification of GCC expression in tissues by the quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) has not undergone analytic and clinicopathologic validation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A technique to quantify GCC mRNA in tissues employing RT-PCR was developed and validated employing external calibration standards of RNA complementary to GCC. RESULTS: GCC qRT-PCR exhibited reaction efficiencies >92%, coefficients of variations <5%, linearity >6 orders of magnitude, and a limit of quantification of >25 copies of GCC cRNA. This assay confirmed that GCC mRNA was overexpressed by colorectal tumors from 41 patients, which correlated with increased GCC protein quantified by immunohistochemistry. Analyses obtained with 164 lymph nodes from patients free of cancer and 15 nodes harboring metastases established a threshold for metastatic disease of approximately 200 GCC mRNA copies/mug total RNA, with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97%. GCC mRNA above that threshold was detected in 76 of 367 ( approximately 21%) nodes free of disease by histopathology from 6 of 23 (26%) patients, suggesting the presence of occult micrometastases. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying GCC mRNA in tissues by RT-PCR employing external calibration standards is analytically robust and reproducible, with high clinicopathologic sensitivity and specificity. This validated assay is being applied to approximately 10,000 lymph nodes in a prospective trial to define the sensitivity of GCC qRT-PCR for staging patients with colorectal cancer.
|
Weinberg
|
Locker GY, Kaul K, Weinberg DS, Gatalica Z, Gong G, Peterman A, Lynch J, Klatzco L, Olopade OI, Bomzer CA, Newlin A, Keenan E, Tajuddin M, Knezetic J, Coronel S, Lynch HT. The I1307K APC polymorphism in Ashkenazi Jews with colorectal cancer: clinical and pathologic features. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006 Aug;169(1):33-8.
Colorectal cancer is common in Ashkenazi Jews. The I1307K APC mutation occurs in 6-7% of Ashkenazi Jews and increases the risk of colorectal cancer. This study aimed to describe the clinical, pathologic and epidemiologic features of colorectal cancer in I1307K carriers to determine whether there were any features which might warrant individual screening for the mutation. In all, 215 Ashkenazi Jews with a personal history of colorectal cancer were enrolled. Clinical and family history, pathology reports, and slides were obtained and blood drawn for I1307K determination. The presence of the mutation was determined by PCR from white blood cell DNA. Colorectal cancer pathology slides were read in a blinded fashion. Of the 215 enrolled patients, 26 (12.1%) tested positive for I1307K. There was no difference in the pathologic features between colorectal cancers in Ashkenazi carriers compared to noncarriers. There was no difference in the age at diagnosis or history of second or ot! her primaries. Carriers had an increased likelihood of having a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (50%) compared to noncarriers (28%, P < 0.04). We could find no distinguishing feature other than family history that characterizes I1307K positive colorectal cancers. We could find no group of Ashkenazi Jews with colorectal cancer for whom screening for I1307K would be clinically useful. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Weinberg
|
Jimbo M, Meyer B, Hyslop T, Cocroft J, Turner BJ, Weinberg DS, Myers RE. Effectiveness of complete diagnostic examination in clinical practice settings. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(6):545-51.
Background: Thorough follow-up of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) result, or a complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE), is recommended as routine care on the basis of findings from colorectal cancer (CRC) screening trials. CDE involves either colonoscopy or the combination of flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema X-ray. However, little evidence outside clinical screening trial settings has been reported in the literature to support CDE performance. The focus of this study was to determine the impact of CDE in primary care practice settings. Methods: We determined diagnostic outcomes for 461 adult patients with a positive FOBT result in 318 primary care practices in southeastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey. Sociodemographic data were collected and CDE status was ascertained for these patients. Polytomous logistic models were used to identify whether having CDE was associated with subsequently being diagnosed with lower gastrointestinal "neoplastic disease" or "other gastrointestinal disease" as compared to "normal findings." Results: Patients who underwent CDE were significantly more likely to have a reported diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia than normal findings (adjusted odds ratio = 3.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.58-8.39, p = 0.02). CDE performance did not result in the differential diagnosis of other gastrointestinal disease. Conclusions: Patients with a positive screening FOBT who underwent CDE were more likely to be diagnosed with colorectal neoplasia than with less serious conditions or have normal findings. Results support the use of CDE in CRC screening. (c) 2006 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
Weinberg
|
Nguyen MT, Herrine SK, Laine CA, Ruth K, Weinberg DS. Description of a new hepatitis c risk assessment tool. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 26;165(17):2013-8.
Background: Because of the low prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the general population, mass screening would be expensive and of low yield. Some researchers advocate targeted screening of persons at elevated HCV risk.Methods: This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a patient-administered tool to assess HCV infection risk. Two hundred seven patients with unknown HCV status from a general medicine practice and 222 HCV-positive patients from a hepatology practice completed a 72-item survey about demographic, social, and clinical risk factors for HCV infection. General medicine patients also underwent HCV serologic testing.Results: Three (1.5%) of 207 general medicine patients had positive HCV antibody test results. These patients plus the 222 hepatology patients were significantly more likely than HCV-negative patients to report an array of factors. In a multivariable model, 7 factors remained significantly associated with HCV infection: sex with a prostit ute or an injecting drug user, exposure to blood products, refusal as a blood donor or as a life insurance applicant, witnessing illicit drug use, and self-reported HBV infection. A simplified model that assigned 1 point for each factor present predicted HCV infection as well as a weighted model (based on chi(2) testing and receiver operating characteristic curve comparison). In a population with a 2% prevalence of HCV infection, people who identified 2 risk factors had a 10% chance of HCV infection, whereas those with 4 or more risk factors had a 50% chance.Conclusions: A self-administered 72-item questionnaire can stratify patients into HCV risk groups. If validated in other primary care populations, this instrument could help target HCV screening.
|
Weinberg
|
|
|
Weinberg
|
Birbe R, Palazzo JP, Walters R, Weinberg D, Schutz S, Waldman SA. Guanylyl cyclase C is a marker of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Hum Pathol. 2005 Feb;36(2):170-9.
Gastrointestinal (GI) tumors continue to be major causes of cancer-related mortality, in part, reflecting metastases that escape detection by histopathology. Moreover, although approximately 10% of carcinomas arise from unknown locations, these tumors frequently originate in the GI tract. Guanylyl cyclase C (GC-C) is a receptor selectively expressed by intestinal epithelial cells whose persistent expression by colorectal carcinomas and ectopic expression by adenocarcinomas of the upper GI tract suggest its use as a marker for GI malignancies. Here, expression of GC-C protein, identified by immunohistochemistry, was examined in tissues and tumors arising from the human GI tract. Guanylyl cyclase C protein was expressed by epithelial cells from the duodenum to the rectum, but not by those in normal esophagus and stomach. Expression was retained in tubular adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, premalignant lesions, and in primary and metastatic adenocarcinomas from the colon, i ncluding metastases to lymph nodes and liver. Moreover, GC-C was ectopically expressed in all cases of dysplasia and adenocarcinomas arising from intestinal metaplasia in esophagus and stomach. Thus, GC-C appears to be an immunohistochemical marker for identifying adenocarcinomas of unknown origin, metastases in patients undergoing staging for GI adenocarcinomas, and intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and tumors arising therein in the upper GI tract. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Weinberg
|
Eisen GM, Weinberg DS. Narative review: Screening for colorectal cancer in patients with a first-degree relative with colonic neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):190-8.
Many patients and providers are aware that colorectal cancer (CRC) "runs in families." A patient with 1 first-degree relative with CRC has approximately twice the personal risk for CRC as a similar person without this family history. Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in the United States. When providers neglect to collect information on family history, they may fail to appropriately tailor recommendations for screening for CRC for many patients.This review considers the existing data and summarizes an evidence-based approach to the common clinical problem of how and when to implement screening for CRC in a patient with a family history of colonic neoplasia. The authors discuss the varying risks for CRC given the patient's age, health habits, and personal and family histories. In the context of a clinical case that focuses on the effect of a single affected first-degree relative, the authors weigh the risks and benefits of various screening alternative s; and briefly address chemoprevention, genetic testing, and future directions in screening for CRC.
|
Weinberg
|
Frick GS, Pitari GM, Weinberg DS, Hyslop T, Schulz S, Waldman SA. Guanylyl cyclase C: A molecular marker for staging and postoperative surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2005;5(5):701-13.
Staging patients with colorectal cancer defines their prognosis and therapeutic management. Unfortunately, histopathology, the current standard for staging, is relatively insensitive for detecting occult micrometastases and a significant fraction of patients are understaged and, consequently, undertreated. Similarly, current approaches to postoperative surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer detect disease recurrence at a point when interventions have little impact on survival. The detection of rare cells in tissue, for accurately staging patients, and in blood, for detecting disease recurrence, could be facilitated by employing sensitive and specific markers of disease. Guanylyl cyclase C (GCC), the receptor for the diarrheagenic bacterial heat-stable enterotoxin, is expressed selectively by cells derived from intestinal mucosa, including normal intestinal cells and colorectal tumor cells, but not by extragastrointestinal tissues and tumors. The nearly uniform expression of relatively high levels by metastatic colorectal tumors suggests that GCC may be a sensitive and specific molecular marker for metastatic colorectal cancer cells. Employing GCC reverse transcriptase PCR, occult colorectal cancer micrometastases were detected in lymph nodes that escaped detection by histopathology. Moreover, marker expression correlated with the risk of disease recurrence. Similarly, GCC reverse transcriptase PCR revealed the presence of tumor cells in blood of all patients examined with metastatic colorectal cancer and, in some studies, was associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and mortality. These observations suggest that GCC reverse transcriptase PCR is a sensitive and specific technique for identifying tumor cells in extraintestinal sites and may be useful for staging and postoperative surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer.
|
Weinberg
|
Bloom BS, de Pouvourville N, Chhatre S, Jayadevappa R, Weinberg D. Breast cancer treatment in clinical practice compared to best evidence and practice guidelines. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan;90(1):26-30.
There is sparse evidence on community practice patterns in treating women with breast cancer. This study compared care of women with breast cancer with evidence from meta-analyses and US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines. Records of 4395 women with breast cancer were abstracted from practices of 19 surgeon oncologists in six specialty practices in the Philadelphia region during 1995-1999. Patients were followed through December 2001. Low-frequency data were obtained on all patients. All other data were from a random sample of 464 women, minimum of 50 patients per practice. Actual care provided was compared to NCCN guidelines and results of meta-analyses. Fewer than half the women received treatments reflecting meta-analysis results or NCCN guidelines, by disease stage/TNM status. Adherence to either standard varied from 0% for LCIS to 87% for stages IIA or IIB node positive. There are multiple interactive reasons for low adherence to guidelines! or meta-analyses results, including insufficient health system supports to clinicians, inadequate organisation and delivery systems and ineffective continuing medical education. The paucity of written information from patient records on physician/patient interactions limits the understanding of treatment decisions.
|
Weinberg
|
Myers RE, Turner B, Weinberg D, Hyslop T, Hauck WW, Brigham T, Rothermel T, Grana J, Schlackman N. Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice & Theory. 2004;38(4):375-81.
(from the journal abstract) Background: Complete diagnostic evaluation or CDE (i.e., colonoscopy or combined flexible sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema X-ray) is often not performed for persons with an abnormal screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT+) result. Method: This study evaluated the impact of a reminder-feedback and educational outreach intervention on primary care practice CDE recommendation and performance rates. Four hundred seventy primary care physicians (PCPs) in 318 practices participated in the study. Patients were mailed an FOBT kit annually as part of a screening program. Practices were randomly assigned to a Control Group (N = 198) or an Intervention Group (N= 120). During an 18-month pre-randomization period and a 9-month post-randomization period, 2,992 screening FOBT+ patients were identified. Intervention practices received the screening program and the intervention. Control practices received only the screening program. Study outcomes were baseline-adjusted CDE recommendation and performance rates. Results: At baseline, about two-thirds of FOBT+ patients received a CDE recommendation, and about half had a CDE performed. At endpoint, CDE recommendation and performance rates were both significantly higher for the Intervention as compared to the Control practices (OR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.37, 3.78, and OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.50, respectively). Conclusions: The reminder-feedback plus educational outreach intervention significantly increased CDE recommendation and performance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).
|
Weinberg
|
|
|
Weinberg
Miller
|