Faculty Publications

Materials and methods: Patients who had unresectable/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to two, and normal bilirubin were eligible. Tumor assessment was carried out every three cycles. Results: We enrolled 29 chemotherapy-naive (CN) and 15 chemotherapy-exposed (CE) eligible patients. Principal toxic effects were diarrhea, neutropenia, and hyperglycemia. There were no toxic deaths. There was one early death, from myocardial infarction. Among 26 CN and assessable patients, there were seven (26.9%) with a partial response (PR) and one (3.8%) with a complete response (CR). There were two PRs and one CR among the patients with CE disease. Median time to progression for CN patients was 4.0 months and for CE patients 3.5 months. Median survival for CN eligible patients was 9.0 months and for CE patients 11.4 months. Conclusions: Docetaxel-irinotecan combination given on a weekly x 2 of 3 schedule is promising in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a common malignancy that remains refractory to available therapies. Gemcitabine has long been the standard, first-line agent in advanced disease. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a commonly expressed target in pancreatic cancer that is involved in tumor proliferation, metastasis, and induction of angiogenesis. The addition of the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib to gemcitabine has recently been demonstrated to provide a small, yet statistically significant, survival benefit in advanced disease. This has prompted further research into the applications of EGFR-targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer, albeit with disappointing results. Resistance to these therapies seems highly prevalent and has been implicated in their limited efficacy. The development of rash is associated with treatment efficacy and suggests that predictive factors may one day be identified to guide appropriate patient selection for these agents. Preclinical research has shown promise that resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies can be overcome through a variety of approaches. Application of this research in clinical trials may ultimately yield an unquestioned role for EGFR-targeted therapy in the management of this disease.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), while curable in many cases with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, remains a disease that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Agents that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have demonstrated beneficial effects in this disease. The Food and Drug Administration approved cetuximab-a monoclonal antibody-in conjunction with radiation, for locally advanced, potentially curable disease, and also as a single agent for incurable recurrent/metastatic disease. In addition, there are more recent data showing a survival benefit for patients with recurrent/metastatic disease who were treated with a first-line regimen of platinum, fluorouracil and cetuximab. These promising results have had a significant impact on the standard of care for HNSCC, and have prompted further research on the role of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of HNSCC. In the following review, we will discuss the history, mechanism, and clinical trials that pertain to the role of cetuximab in the treatment of HNSCC.

Background: We have previously reported nuclear localization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein in oropharyngeal cancer tissue. Nuclear EGFR levels were inversely correlated with survival and response to radiotherapy. Here, we sought to identify the determinants and correlates of nuclear EGFR content. Methods: We analyzed an oropharyngeal cancer tissue microarray for the expression of the key molecules of the EGFR signaling cascade using an automated image analysis technique (AQUA) scored on a scale of 0 to 255, which permits protein quantitation and subcellular localization. Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer treated with radiotherapy or surgery and radiotherapy were eligible. Data were analyzed using Spearman correlations and multiple linear regression with robust SEs. Results: Of the 95 tumors included in this study, 72 (75%) had sufficient tissue for analysis of nuclear EGFR. Nuclear EGFR levels were associated with membranous/cytoplasmic EGFR levels (p = 0.82, P < 0.001), nuclear extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (P = 0.30, P = 0.01), and nuclear proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; p = 0.36, P = 0.003). Nuclear phosphorylated-Akt, cyclin D1, phosphatase and tensin homolog (mutated in multiple cancers 1) (PTEN), p53, and proliferation marker Ki-67 levels did not correlate with nuclear EGFR level. In multivariable analysis, only PCNA retained its significant association (P = 0.01). Conclusions: These results are consistent with preclinical data showing that EGFR may function as a tyrosine kinase in the nucleus, phosphorylating and stabilizing PCNA. The nuclear activity of EGFR may constitute a novel therapeutic target.

Pancreatic cancer remains a treatment-refractory cancer. Standard therapy for metastatic cancer is gemcitabine chemotherapy, with a median survival of 5-6 months. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly expressed in pancreatic cancer and has been evaluated as a therapeutic target. A Phase III trial of gemcitabine with or without the EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, demonstrated a modest but significant prolongation of survival with the addition of erlotinib. A Phase II trial of gemcitabine with the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab resulted in a 1-year survival of 32%. A Phase III trial of gemcitabine with or without cetuximab and a randomized Phase II trial of the Murren regimen with or without cetuximab are completed; results for both are anticipated in 2007. A Phase I trial of gemcitabine with the EGFR/Her-2 inhibitor, lapatinib, is completed. Improved patient selection and rational combination of targeted therapies will be necessary to optimize the management of patients with this tragic disease.

BACKGROUND:: Docetaxel and irinotecan have activity in pancreatic cancer. The combination of docetaxel and irinotecan is attractive because of preclinical evidence of synergy between the two drugs. We have previously demonstrated the safety of docetaxel 35 mg/m and irinotecan 50 mg/m given on days 1, 8, 15, and 21 of a 35-day schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Patients who had unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, bidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2, and normal bilirubin levels were eligible. Tumor assessment was performed with computed tomography, computed tomographic angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging every 2 cycles. Response was graded according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS:: We enrolled 37 eligible patients. Principal grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (21%), neutropenia (30%), and hyperglycemia (30%). There were 3 patients with febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. There were 4 early deaths. Among 36 evaluable patients, 9 (24%) attained a partial response and 1 (3%) attained a complete response for an objective response rate of 27%. One patient enrolled because she had been deemed to have unresectable disease but then underwent resection with negative margins after attaining a confirmed partial response. Median survival for all eligible patients is 9.4 months (range 0-68+ months) with minimum follow-up for surviving patients of 23.4 months. One-year survival is 43%. The patient who attained a complete response is alive with recurrent disease at 68 months. CONCLUSIONS:: The docetaxel/irinotecan combination given on a weekly schedule is an active treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the incidence of late cardiotoxicity after dose-dense and -intense adjuvant sequential doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) for breast cancer (BC) with >/= 4 involved ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from 1994 to 2001 after definitive BC surgery if >/=4 axillary nodes were involved. Planned treatment was A 90 mg/m(2) q 14 days x 3, T 250 mg/m(2) q 14 days x 3, C 3 g/m(2 )q 14 days x 3 with filgrastim (G) support. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was monitored using equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) before the initiation of chemotherapy, and after three cycles of each chemotherapeutic agent. At a median follow-up of 7 years, we obtained ERNA scans on 32 patients to evaluate the long-term cardiotoxicity of this regimen. RESULTS: Eighty-five eligible patients enrolled on the treatment protocol. Clinical heart failure developed in one patient. Seven (8%) patients had LVEF < 50% at the end of therapy. No cardiac-related deaths occurred. Thirty-two (46%) of 69 surviving patients have consented to late cardiac imaging. At a median follow-up of 7 years, the median absolute change in LVEF from baseline was -5.5%; [range (-8%) to (+36%)], and from the end of chemotherapy was -2.0%; [range (-25%) to (+16%)]. Four patients (12%) had a LVEF < 50%; two of these four patients had an LVEF of < 50% at the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Late development of asymptomatic decline in cardiac function may occur after dose-dense and -intense adjuvant therapy, but is uncommon.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the HER family of tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors. Binding to EGFR by its natural li-gands, mainly epidermal growth factor (EGF) or transforming growth factor (TGF)-a, results in a conformational change in the receptor, which promotes homo- or heterodimerization or oligomerisation with other EGFR mols. or other HER family members. Dimerization results in the activation of intra-cellular tyrosine kinase, autophosphorylation and activation of signal transduction mols., ultimately leading to cell cycle progression, reduced apoptotic capacity, angiogenesis and the metastatic phenotype. EGFR is expressed on normal human cells and also across a range of malignancies. Tumor EGFR expression correlates with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy. Cetuximab is a chimeric human:murine monoclonal antibody that binds competitively to the EGFR. Binding of the antibody to the EGFR p-revents activation of the receptor by endogenous ligands; proliferation is reduced, apoptosis enhanced, and angiogenesis, invasiveness and metastasis reduced. Binding of cetuximab to the receptor also results in internalisation and degrdn. of the antibody-receptor complex, downregulating EGFR expression. EGFR has been recognized as an important therapeutic target in cancer. Other antibodies are also in development, and small mol. inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase domain are available. Cetuximab adds to the activity of radiotherapy in locoregional head and neck cancer, and when given with platinum-based chemotherapy is active in a proportion of patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, as is cetuximab monotherapy. When cetuximab is added to cisplatin monotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, the objective response rate is significantly improved and the hazard ratio for pr-ogression is 0.78. The most commonly reported adverse event assocd. with cetuximab treatment is an acneiform rash that occurred in 70 - 80% of patients treated with cetuximab. Presence of the characteristic rash is significantly assocd. with response and/or survival. It is possible that development of acneiform rash may become an important clin. prognostic marker. Serious cetuximab-related toxicities include hypersensitivity reactions. Thus, cetuximab is biol. active across a range of clin. scenarios in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ongoing studies will be important in establishing its role in the routine management of head and neck cancer. [on SciFinder (R)]

Background: Several lines of evidence support the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a molecular target for therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Determination of tumor EGFR levels by conventional immunohistochemistry has not always predicted antitumor efficacy. Quantitative assays may provide more accurate assessment of the level of EGFR receptor in the tumor, which may thus provide more reliable prognostic and predictive information. We studied the prognostic value of quantitative assessment of EGFR in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers treated with radiotherapy. Experimental Design: We studied EGFR protein expression on a tissue microarray composed of 95 oropharyngeal cancer cases using an in situ molecular-based method of quantitative assessment of protein expression (AQUA) and correlated those with clinical and pathologic data. Automated, quantitative analysis uses cytokeratin to define pixels as cancer (tumor mask) within the array spot and measures intensity of EGFR expression using a Cy5-conjugated antibody within the mask. A continuous index score is generated, which is directly proportional to the number of molecules per unit area, and cases were defined as high expressing if they were above the median expression level. Results: The mean follow-up time for survivors was 44.9 months, and for the entire cohort was 34.8 months. Patients with high tumor EGFR expression levels had a local recurrence rate of 58% compared with 17% for patients with low EGFR tumor expression (P<0.01). Similarly, patients with high nuclear EGFR expression had a local recurrence rate of 54% compared with 21% for patients with low EGFR nuclear expression (P<0.05). Additionally, patients with high tumor and nuclear EGFR levels had inferior disease-free survival compared with low expressors (19% versus 43% and 19% versus 45%, respectively. P<0.05 for each). In multivariate analysis adjusting for well-characterized prognostic variables, high tumor and nuclear EGFR expression levels retained their prognostic significance. Conclusion: The AQUA system provides a continuous measurement of EGFR on paraffin-embedded tissue and was able to reveal the association between EGFR expression and outcome expected from the biological role of EGFR. In the future, EGFR AQUA score may be useful in predicting response to EGFR-targeted therapies.